CBP Makes Online I-94 Application Payment Available to Travelers Arriving at a Land Port of Entry

US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have announced an enhancement to the I-94 website that allows travelers to apply and pay for their I-94 online prior to arriving at a US land port of entry. Travelers can now speed up their entry into the US by providing their biographic and travel information and paying the $6 fee for their I-94 application online up to seven days prior to their US entry. Note at this time this online I-94 application only applies to entries via land, not air and sea.

First implemented over fifty years ago, the I-94 is a document given to foreign nationals that (1) tracks arrivals and (indirectly) departures to and from the United States, and (2) is evidence of legal status in the US for foreign nationals in their category of admission (for example, H-1, O-1, L-1, F-1, and so on). The I-94 document is distinct from both a foreign national’s visa stamp (the stamp processed into a passport by a US Embassy/Consulate abroad) and the admission stamp (which is the ink stamped into a foreign national’s passport noting the date and place of entry and expiration of stay along with the handwritten category of admission).

Back in 2013, CBP made a major change with the I-94 procedure by eliminating the issuance of paper I-94 cards when foreign nationals arrived in the US. Upon entry to the US, instead of receiving a paper I-94 card, most foreign nationals receive only an admission stamp in their passport. This admission stamp notes the date and place of entry, category of admission, and expiration of stay. CBP uploads the foreign nationals’ information into its electronic I-94 system, and foreign nationals can, at a later time, print their I-94 document. Now, with the most recent advancement of the I-94 application, after submitting their information and payment on line, travelers will receive a “provisional I-94.” The I-94 online application will collect information that is otherwise collected in-person at the land port of entry, and includes biographic information (name, date of birth, country of citizenship), passport details, visa details (if applicable), and petition/Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVIS) number (if applicable).

CBP Commissioner R. Gil Kerlikowske explains the reasons for this change in a statement:

We continue our commitment to transforming the international arrivals experience with this new I-94 offering that expedites entry into the US at land ports of entry, while maintaining the highest standard of security. This automated functionality increases the efficiency of the entry process and reduces administrative duties for CBP officers—ultimately resulting in shorter waits for travelers requiring an I-94.

After online submission of all pertinent details, to finalize the I-94 issuance process, a traveler must present themselves at a land port of entry within seven days of their application and submit biometrics, if applicable, and be interviewed by a CBP officer. Travelers should be prepared to show evidence of their residence, employment, and/or travel plans, if requested by the CBP officer. If the traveler does not complete their I-94 issuance process within seven days of their application, their provisional I-94 will expire and they will have to reapply and pay the fee again. There are no refunds if the I-94 is not issued within the seven-day period or if the traveler is denied entrance to the US.

The secure I-94 website is designed to be user friendly and payment can be made with a credit card, debit card, direct debit, or through PayPal. Benefits of this process include “increased efficiencies during processing, decreased paper usage, a streamlined CBP inspection process for the traveling public and reduced operating costs.” Again, the online I-94 application only applies to US land port of entries at this time. There is no indication if and when it will extend to air and sea entries.

CBP claims the previous paperless online automation of the I-94 Arrival/Departure Record has greatly improved the traveler experience while saving the US government an estimated $34.5 million in its first two years, and this additional change should expedite the I-94 process even more, while this remains to be seen. For more information regarding the I-94 land automation or to access an electronic Form I-94, visit www.cbp.gov/I94, and to apply for the I-94 online, visit http://i94.cbp.dhs.gov.

All about Visa Reciprocity

Reciprocity is a principle of international law stating that the benefits, privileges, and penalties granted by one country to citizens of another country should be returned in-kind when the reverse occurs. In immigration law, this means that when a foreign government imposes certain fees or conditions on US citizens for certain visa types, the US government will impose the same fees or conditions on nationals of that country for similar visa types.

Read more

NY TIMES: “Haitian Men Cut Off From Families as U.S. Tightens Entry Rules”

As Hurricane Matthew, a dangerous Category 4 storm with devastating 145mph winds, hits Haiti and the Caribbean, Haitian families are also dealing with a sudden change in US entry rules that is dividing family members trying to enter the US. Late last month the US government decided to fully resume deportations of undocumented Haitian immigrants after previously allowing undocumented Haitians to enter the US and apply for temporary humanitarian parole, which was instituted in response to the devastating 2010 earthquake in Haiti. The policy change announced September 22 is a response by the Obama administration to a recent large influx of Haitian migrants who have traveled north from Brazil to Mexico to seek entry to the US at various points along the border.

Until late last month, most Haitian undocumented immigrants have been given permission to remain in the country for as long as three years under the humanitarian parole provision, immigrant advocates said. With the policy change, however, Haitians who arrive at the border without visas will be put into expedited removal proceedings. Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security, justified the move in a statement by noting that Haiti had “improved sufficiently to permit the U.S. government to remove Haitian nationals on a more regular basis.”

The sudden deportation policy change has separated wives from husbands and children from their fathers, stranding men in Mexico. “I’m hoping God makes miracles,” Sandra Alexandre, who was allowed into the US last month ahead of her boyfriend and gave birth three days later, tells the New York Times. Immigrant advocates in San Diego have reportedly identified more than fifty families in that city alone separated due the policy change, and are making appeals to Homeland Security officials to help reunite the families. “The bottom line is that this was not a well-conceived policy,” Andrea Guerrero, executive director of Alliance San Diego, a group helping Haitians who have crossed the border, tells the New York Times. “It seemed to have come down from one day to the next without a clear understanding of what was going on and what kind of impact it would have.”  

Part of the reason for why families are being separated is that border officials have been using an appointment system giving priority to women and children. Men, even when accompanying their partners and children, usually had to wait for later appointments in overcrowded shelters. Sandra Alexandre, for example, arrived in the border city of Mexicali with her boyfriend, Volcy Dieumercy, after a ten-week trip from Curitiba, Brazil. Because she was pregnant, Mexican and American border officials granted Alexandre an earlier appointment but denied the couple’s request that Dieumercy be processed on the same day. Alexandre entered under a three-year humanitarian parole, and soon learned that Dieumercy had been barred from entering under the new policy. If Dieumercy is not allowed into the country she is unsure of what she would do. “I haven’t thought that far ahead,” she says. “Right now, I’m only thinking positively.” Dieumercy knows that if he tries to enter the US at a port of entry, he will probably be deported to Haiti. “I need my family,” he says. “I can’t wait any longer. I’m very sad.” 

Haitian nationals currently covered by Temporary Protected Status are unaffected by this change in policy, the Department of Homeland Security says. Specifically, Haitian nationals who have been continuously residing in the US since January 12, 2011 and currently hold TPS may remain in the United States and are not subject to removal. At this time it is uncertain if a potentially devastating Hurricane Matthew would cause the US government to reverse the recent deportation policy change. We will provide updates as we receive them.

UPDATE OCTOBER 14, 2016:

US Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson announced this week at an event in Mexico City that after Hurricane Matthew ravaged Haiti, killing at least a thousand people and leaving 1.4 million in need of humanitarian assistance, it has temporarily suspended deportations. "We will have to deal with that situation, address it, be sympathetic to the plight of the people of Haiti as a result of the hurricane," Johnson said at the event. "But after that condition has been addressed, we intend to resume the policy change," he added, though he did not specify a time frame.

USCIS Is Going Paperless (Someday): What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

They say the art of letter writing is dead, and yet every week we send carefully penned letters, laboriously printed on reams of dead trees and lovingly hand-signed in blue or black ink, a choice that can be surprisingly important to the receiving agent at US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS). Many US government agencies have implemented electronic forms for everything from paying your taxes to registering to vote. And, of course, many people have been conducting much of their personal business online for decades now—from ordering lunch to banking to managing their 401(k).

Read more

NY TIMES: “Immigrants Aren’t Taking Americans’ Jobs, New Study Finds”

A new study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—private, nonprofit institutions that “provide expert advice on some of the most pressing challenges facing the nation and the world”—has found that immigrants’ long-term impact on overall wages and employment of native-born US workers is very minimal and that immigration has an overall positive impact. The non-partisan report includes research from fourteen leading economists, demographers, and other scholars, including those, such as Marta Tienda of Princeton, who believe immigration has positive effects and others who are skeptical of its benefits, including George J. Borjas, a Harvard economist.  

The report found that when measured over a period of ten years or more, the impact of immigration on the wages of native-born workers overall is very small, and any negative impact is most likely to be for native-born workers who have not completed high school—i.e., those who share job qualifications similar to that of many low-skilled immigrant workers. Specifically, the research finds that while immigration does not affect employment levels for native-born workers who haven’t finished high school it may reduce the number of hours worked for these same workers. Francine D. Blau, Frances Perkins Professor of Industrial and Labor Relations and professor of economics at Cornell University and chair of the panel that conducted the study and wrote the report, comments that there are many reasons why those who haven’t completed high school struggle to find work and there is no “indication immigration is the major factor.”

For the effect of high-skilled immigrants on native wages and employment, the report notes that several studies have found a “positive impact of skilled immigration on the wages and employment of both college- and non-college-educated natives.” These findings are consistent with the view that “skilled immigrants are often complementary to native-born workers; that spillovers of wage-enhancing knowledge and skills occur as a result of interactions among workers; and that skilled immigrants innovate sufficiently to raise overall productivity.”

While the report found that immigrants had minimal impact on the wages of native-born workers, in terms of fiscal impact, first-generation immigrants at the state and local levels are more costly to governments than the native-born, in large part due to educational costs, and that when compared with the native-born, first-generation immigrants contributed less in taxes during working ages because they were, on average, less educated and earned less. The children of immigrants, however, as adults are “among the strongest economic and fiscal contributors in the US population, contributing more in taxes than either their parents or the rest of the native-born population.”

Immigration and the role of immigrants in the US has been a hotly debated topic this election season. Some American workers, still recovering from the recession, have blamed immigrants for lack of quality jobs. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has called for a crackdown on undocumented immigrants, saying they “compete directly against vulnerable American workers” while also proposing new controls on legal immigration to “boost wages and ensure open jobs are offered to American workers first.”

Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies and one of the outsider reviewers for the report (and generally a critic of favorable US immigration policies) notes: “Immigration is primarily a redistributive policy, transferring income from workers to owners of capital and from taxpayers to low-income immigrant families. The information in the new report will help Americans think about these tradeoffs in a constructive way.”  

Dr. Blau says: “The panel's comprehensive examination revealed many important benefits of immigration—including on economic growth, innovation, and entrepreneurship—with little to no negative effects on the overall wages or employment of native-born workers in the long term.”