Effective October 1, 2023, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) will no longer require applicants filing Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, to pay the $85 biometric services fee as part of the application process. Additionally, in most cases, applicants will not be scheduled to attend a biometric services appointment. “However, if USCIS determines that biometrics are required, the applicant will receive a notice with information about appearing for their biometric services appointment.”
Read moreAs DHS Withdraws Trump-Era Biometrics Rule, USCIS Will Temporarily Suspend Biometrics for Certain I-539 Applicants and Allow Biometrics Phone Rescheduling
Over the past few weeks, both U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) made significant announcements regarding biometrics for certain visa applications as a way of addressing the extensive backlogs for these cases.
Suspending Biometrics for Certain I-539 Applicants
First, effective May 17, USCIS announced that they “will temporarily suspend the biometrics submission requirement for certain applicants filing Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, requesting an extension of stay in or change of status to H-4, L-2, and E nonimmigrant status.” USCIS noted that the agency will permit adjudications for those specific categories to proceed based on biographic information and related background checks, without needing fingerprints and a photograph. The temporary suspension will apply through May 17, 2023, and may be extended or revoked by the USCIS director.
This temporary change in policy will impact applicants seeking an extension of stay or change of status to H-4 (spouses and children of H-1B’s), L-2 (spouses and children of L-1’s), and E (dependents of E-1, E-2 and E-3 principal nonimmigrants) status, whose applications were pending on May 17, 2021 and who have not yet received a biometric services appointment notice, as well as those filing their application after May 17, 2021. Unfortunately, O-3 (spouses and children of O-1s) are not included in the temporary biometrics submission suspension.
Read moreUSCIS Processing Employment Authorization Extension Requests with Previous Biometrics
US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) announced this week that they will reuse previously submitted biometrics so the agency can process valid Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, extension requests due to the temporary closure of Application Support Centers (ASC) to the public in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The agency notes that this announcement is consistent with existing USCIS authority regarding the agency’s ability to reuse previously submitted biometrics. Applicants who had an appointment scheduled with an ASC on or after the March 18 closure or who has filed an I-765 extension will have their application processed using previously submitted biometrics. USCIS notes this policy will remain effect until ASCs are open for appointments to the public.
The Washington Post: “FBI, ICE find state driver’s license photos are a gold mine for facial-recognition searches.”
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Immigration Customs Enforcement agents use state department of motor vehicle databases for facial-recognition purposes, reveal newly released documents. These records, obtained by researchers with Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy and Technology and shared with The Washington Post, contain thousands of facial-recognition requests, internal documents, and emails over the past five years.The Washington Post reports that “DMV records contain the photos of a vast majority of a state’s residents, most of whom have never been charged with a crime,” affecting millions of Americans whose photos are being used without their knowledge. Lawmakers across the aisle have criticized the technology as a “dangerous, pervasive and error-prone surveillance tool.”
Read moreThe Atlantic: This Is Exactly What Privacy Experts Said Would Happen
According to a statement that the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency released last week, photos of travelers and their vehicle license plates snapped at a US border control point have been hacked. In an email statement to journalists, CBP confirmed that an undisclosed subcontractor transferred copies of license plates and travelers’ photos from federal servers to its own company network without CPB’s authorization. CBP reports that its own servers were unharmed by any cyber attack.
Read moreUSCIS to Publish Revised Form I-539 and New Form I-539A for Co-Applicants
US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) announced a revised Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, which will be published on their website on March 11, 2019. USCIS will only accept the revised Form I-539 with an edition date of 02/04/19 effective March 11, 2019, and USCIS will reject any Form I-539 with an edition date of 12/23/16 or earlier. On March 11, the agency will also publish a new Form I-539A, Supplemental Information for Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, a form that will replace the Supplement A provided in previous versions of Form I-539. Form I-539A is not a standalone form and should only be submitted along with Form I-539.
Read moreHow to Replace or Renew Your Green Card
Whether it is a lost Green Card (you know the feeling when you have searched everywhere and slowly come to the dreaded realization that it’s gone) or an expired ten-year Green Card, or even if there is a mistake on your Green Card, you will have to get a new card. And, of course, this type of thing always seems to happen when you have to travel internationally or are starting a new job in a few days. What to do???
Read moreUSCIS: Processing Error for Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence
US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) says that due to a processing error, on May 4, 2018, the agency mailed a number of biometric services appointment notices with incorrect Application Support Center (ASC) locations to petitioners who filed Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence. These affected notices have a date of May 4, 2018 and a case type of “I-751 – PETITION TO REMOVE CONDITIONS ON RESIDENCE.” Theses notices instruct petitioners to appear for their biometric services appointments beginning the week of May 21, 2018, at ASCs located out of the normal geographic area.
Read morePresident Trump Signs Executive Orders to Build a Border Wall, Dramatically Increase Deportations, and Enact a Temporary Ban on Refugees
On Wednesday President Trump signed two executive orders to begin construction of a wall on the US-Mexico border, increase border patrol forces as well as the number of immigration enforcement officers who carry out deportations. The orders also intend to strip so-called “sanctuary cities” of federal grant funding and establish new wide-ranging criteria that could make many more undocumented immigrants priorities for removal. "Beginning today, the United States of America gets back control of its borders," President Trump told workers of the Department of Homeland Security at the department's headquarters in Washington, where he signed the orders.
Although in the order President Trump directs the "immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border," funding for the wall would require Congressional approval. Trump has claimed that Mexico will reimburse US taxpayers for the construction costs, most recently suggesting he would obtain the funds by instituting a twenty percent import tax. Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto has denied that Mexico will pay for the wall, and canceled a planned meeting in the US with President Trump in protest.
The executive orders call to increase Border Patrol forces by an additional 5,000 agents as well as for 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to carry out removals, again subject to Congress appropriating the sufficient funds. The executive actions also outline new criteria to determine which undocumented immigrants should be prioritized for deportation, potentially placing hundreds of thousands and arguably even millions more people in the federal government's crosshairs to deport. The order states that any undocumented immigrant convicted or simply charged with a crime that hasn't been adjudicated could be deported. (Under former President Obama, only undocumented immigrants convicted of a felony, serious misdemeanor, or multiple misdemeanors were prioritized for removal.) The order also specifies additional new priorities for deportation including undocumented immigrants who abuse public benefits, or simply those who in the “judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security," open-ended criteria that could be applied to many.
Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, tells CNN that Trump's actions are "extremist, ineffective and expensive" and says the president is using lies about immigrants to push US policy. “Trump is taking a wrecking ball to our immigration system. It shouldn't come as a surprise that chaos and destruction will be the outcome," Hincapié says, noting that her organization will challenge Trump's moves in court.
Later this week or next President Trump is also expected to sign executive orders to block refugees from Syria and suspend the US refugee program for an initial 120-day period to ensure no admissions are made for those who “pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States.” The order comes despite the fact that Syrian refugees already undergo intense screening processes that often last eighteen to twenty-four months. The orders, still in draft form, also stipulate that when the refugee program is resumed, it prioritizes refugees who have undergone religious-based persecution, “provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality.” For Muslim-majority countries this would presumably mean Christians, Yazidis, and other religious minorities, even though the majority of those killed, persecuted, and displaced by the Islamic State are Muslims. The total amount of refugees admitted also will total 50,000, decreased from 110,000 that the Obama administration had planned to accept.
The draft order calls for an immediate thirty-day halt to all immigrant and nonimmigrant entry of travelers from certain countries—including Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia—whose citizens “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.” The order would allow those with visas to be turned away at US airports and other entry points. Additional provisions under the order would require all travelers to the United States to provide biometric data on entry and exit from the country, instead of current entry-only requirements, and suspends a waiver system under which citizens of certain countries where US visas are required do not have to undergo a face-to-face interview at a US Embassy or Consulate. The draft executive order also calls for visa applicants to be screened for their ideologies. “In order to protect Americans, we must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward our country and its founding principles,” it reads.
To justify the order, the action claims “hundreds of foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001.” The Washington Post notes, however, that most terrorist or suspected terrorist attacks since 9/11 have been carried out by US citizens. Moreover, the 9/11 hijackers hailed primarily from Saudi Arabia, as well as the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon, all which are US allies and not affected by the proposed ban.
Immigrant advocates and human rights groups have criticized the announced actions. “To think that Trump’s first 100 days are going to be marked by this very shameful shutting of our doors to everybody who is seeking refuge in this country is very concerning,” Marielena Hincapié tells the New York Times. “Everything points to this being simply a backdoor Muslim ban."
UPDATE JANUARY 27, 2017: This afternoon President Trump signed the executive order, “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals,” that according to a draft released earlier this week enacts a temporary ban on refugees and suspends visas to immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries.
UPDATE FEBRUARY 4, 2017: A judge in Seattle ordered a nationwide halt on Friday to the travel ban after a Boston court refused to extend a stay. The ruling from the Seattle judge, James Robart of the Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington, an appointee of President George W. Bush, is the most far-reaching ruling to date, though courts around the country have stayed certain aspects of President Trump's travel ban.
The federal government was “arguing that we have to protect the US from individuals from these countries, and there’s no support for that,” Judge Robart said in his decision. The judge's temporary ruling bars the administration from enforcing two parts of President Trump’s order: the ninety-day suspension of entry into the US of individuals from seven Muslim-majority countries—Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen—and the order's limits on accepting refugees, including “any action that prioritizes the refugee claims of certain religious minorities.”
Initially calling the ruling "outrageous," the White House late Friday issued a revised statement saying it would seek an emergency halt to the judge’s stay to restore the president’s “lawful and appropriate" order. Earlier this week the State Department said 60,000 visas had been revoked. A State Department official tells CNN that the department has "reversed the cancellation of visas that were provisionally revoked following the Trump administration's travel ban—so long as those visas were not stamped or marked as canceled." The Department of Homeland Security also said Saturday it has suspended actions to implement President Trump's executive immigration order. Nationals of the affected seven-Muslim majority countries who intend on traveling outside the US or to the US should consult an experienced immigration attorney. We will continue to provide updates as we receive them.
After Paris Attacks Changes to the Visa Waiver Program (ESTA) to Enhance Security
In response to the Paris terror attacks, the White House yesterday announced changes to the Visa Waiver Program, used by approximately 20 million visitors per year for citizens of thirty-eight program partner countries around the world. The changes to the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), also known as the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), are designed to counter the “ongoing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters” who might use the program, and are meant to “aggressively” strengthen the program and bolster relationships with the VWP’s partners. These changes come after new countries were added to the VWP program and other security enhancements were made earlier this year.
What Are the New Changes?
The Obama administration is instructing government agencies to move forward with the following security enhancements:
- The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will immediately modify its applications to obtain information from VWP travelers regarding any past travel to “countries constituting a terrorist safe haven” and work in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence to identify and review these countries to make traveler risk assessments;
- DHS along with other agencies will accelerate its review process for VWP partner countries and provide a report to the President within sixty days regarding possible pilot programs to assess the collection and use of biometrics (fingerprints and/or photographs) to increase security and also identify any countries that are deficient in key areas of cooperation;
- The FBI director will evaluate the terrorism information sharing and any deficiencies between the US and VWP countries in consultation with other agencies and provide the president a report within sixty days;
- DHS will offer assistance to VWP countries to better facilitate terrorism information sharing, including for screening refugees or asylum seekers;
- US government agencies will promote the Global Entry program among VWP partners to further expand this trusted traveler program;
- DHS will work with Congress to seek permission to increase Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) fines from $5,000 to $50,000 for air carriers that fail to verify a traveler’s passport data; and
- US government agencies will deploy Foreign Fighter Surge Teams to work with countries to counter terrorist travel and provide assistance as needed to enhance border security and legislation.
Working with Congress to Enhance the VWP
In addition to these security changes, the White House will work with Congress to provide statutory authority for many key security enhancements to the VWP, including:
- Improve ability to identify individuals who have traveled to conflict zones to train or fight with terrorist organizations and coordinate information between VWP partners and INTERPOL;
- Use international agencies such as INTERPOL to track lost and stolen travel documents to prevent their usage as well as general information sharing to use in border screening activities for VWP partner countries;
- Accelerate requirement for 100% of VWP travelers to use e-passports with security chips and also see how biometrics could be effectively added to the VWP process; and
- Expand the preclearance program so Customs and Border Protection officers can inspect passengers and their baggage at foreign airports prior to departing for the United States.
Even More Changes to the VWP
In addition to the Obama administration’s VWP changes, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Jeff Flake plan to introduce legislation that would prohibit anyone who has traveled to Syria or Iraq in the last five years from traveling to the United States using the VWP and instead require them to obtain a traditional visa stamp.
Not everyone is welcoming changes to the Visa Waiver Program. California Travel Association President Barbara Newton and leaders of several California tourism boards are concerned that changes to the VWP could affect the billion-dollar tourism industry. “We certainly support security and safety of our citizens and everyone around the world,” Newton said to the LA Times. “But we don’t want to see the government do something that would disrupt business and travel.”