The 5 Biggest Immigration-Related Acts and Cases in US History

It’s November already, can you believe it? In addition to colder temperatures and the end of daylight savings times (hello, darkness!), it’s also time for the most “American” of holidays—Thanksgiving. While the history of Thanksgiving is much more complicated than what is commonly taught in schools, it’s nevertheless an opportune time to reflect on our presence in this country as immigrants, refugees, and, yes, colonizers, and also reflect on how we have historically treated other immigrants and refugees. To that end, we are looking back at five major acts and cases in US history that have shaped and influenced US immigration law and policy.

Read more

Forbes: "Trump Plans Far-Reaching Set of New Immigration Regulations"

The Department of Homeland Security released the Unified Agenda this month showing that the Trump administration is proposing new immigration regulations that would have a dramatic effect on employers, international students, H-1B and L-1 visa holders, EB-5 investors, and asylum seekers, among others. Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy, writes in Forbes that the agenda is "ambitious and far-reaching" and an "attempt to lock into place changes to immigration policy that cannot be easily undone, regardless of the outcome of the 2020 presidential election."

Read more

USCIS Proposes to Dramatically Increase Filing Fees   

US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) announced earlier this month a proposed rule to adjust the fee schedule by a weighted average increase of twenty-one percent. In making the announcement, USCIS noted that unlike most government agencies, USCIS is fee-funded and claims the current fees if left unchanged would underfund the agency by approximately $1.3 billion per year. “USCIS is required to examine incoming and outgoing expenditures, just like a business, and make adjustments based on that analysis,” Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of USCIS, said in a statement. “This proposed adjustment in fees would ensure more applicants cover the true cost of their applications and minimizes subsidies from an already over-extended system.” 

Read more